Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Against Moloch's avatar

Tesla pulled off a really clever thing with the original Roadster: it was expensive and had crap range, but it was a rocket. They found the one niche where their technology was compelling in spite of all its deficits.

I’m not sure what the equivalent is for lab-grown meat: it’s expensive and doesn’t taste good, but (fill in the blank). Not causing animal suffering doesn’t seem compelling enough unless you can do it at scale.

ToSummarise's avatar

I really enjoy eating meat too (especially salmon!), so am very disappointed to hear that lab-grown salmon doesn't taste anything like the real thing.

In terms of the political headwinds - I've heard that Middle Eastern countries like Qatar and Saudi Arabia have been making significant investments in cultivated meat for food-security purposes, and to try and diversify their economies away from oil. Perhaps this is an area where the politics in those countries are more conducive to this type of innovation than in the US. (Though I understand there have been headwinds there, too.)

No posts

Ready for more?